Kontakte, Links

Montag, 11. April 2016
Puls, 21.05 h

Eine ganze Sendung zum Thema Phagen-Therapie mit dem Autor dieser Webseite als Patient in Tiflis.
Jetzt auf Youtube ansehen:

Fernsehen DRS1

Mehr Schein als Sein. Schulmedizinische Behandlungen sind riskanter, als man uns glauben macht:

Von Mike Adams

ist reine, angewandte Naturwissenschaft!

Phagentherapie hat nichts zu tun mit Heilmethoden auf unklarer oder wissenschaftlich fragwürdiger Basis. Hochqualifizierte Aerzte und Mikrobiologen haben während Jahrzehnten die Methode entwickelt für medizinische und auch vor allem militärische Zwecke (gegen biologische Waffen).
Phagentherapie scheut nicht die Zusammenarbeit mit Ihrem Arzt.

Lesen Sie mehr dazu hier

HomeSix reasons (english) DIESE SEITE WEITER EMPFEHLEN:

6 Reasons Why Most Scientific Research is Fake, False or Fraudulent

Christina Sarich, Staff
Waking Times

How often do scientists smugly quote the latest research on a topic only later to be made the fool by insider revelations that published research in peer-reviewed journals is abjectly false? This happens so frequently now, that it has become clear: Science is broken, and most scientific research is fraudulent.

It isn’t broken like a bike needing a new tire, or even an outdated paradigm that has reached its tipping point, as in the time of the renaissance. Modern science is broken for reasons that might shock you.

First, there’s a replication crisis.
More and more studies simply cannot be replicated, so any false theories are not thrown out, but left floating as acceptable ‘fact’ in the hallowed scientific ethers, when they are nothing more than studies paid for and promoted by the companies who have a marked interest in proving their personal hypothesis.

Take for example a recent review of 67 blockbuster drug discovery research findings published in prestigious journals.  A review of the studies found that three-fourths of them weren’t right. Bayer simply couldn’t replicate findings that were published in more than 75 percent of their drug trials. Another study of cancer research found that only 11 percent of preclinical cancer research could be reproduced – but the problem isn’t just in the pharmaceutical industry.

Even in physics, supposedly the most complex and most reliable of all sciences, two of the most flaunted physics results of the past few years — the announced discovery of both cosmic inflation and gravitational waves at the BICEP2 experiment in Antarctica, as well as the supposed discovery of superluminal neutrinos at the Swiss-Italian border — have now been retracted.

Why the gross negligence in a field that has been heralded as sacrosanct? The errors in science have been due to simple arithmetic miscalculations or excel spreadsheet mistakes, but they are also due to industry greed and outright fraud.

Science has even discredited itself – in one study meant to hoodwink the very prestigious British Medical Journal, a paper with eight major errors was submitted. Not a single one of the 221 scientists who reviewed the paper caught all the errors in it, and only 30 percent of reviewers recommended that the paper be rejected.

Second, scientists can manipulate data almost any way they deem fit.
Data can be excluded, included and re-arranged to support the presupposition of any scientist.

Third, the scientific community doesn’t listen to women, young people, or those whose ideas go against the current scientific dogma. The greatest scientific pioneers were once weirdoes with wiry glasses and grandiose ideas that they set out to prove with the scientific method. Now, we have an aged scientific population, that is mostly white and male, worried about getting tenure at their institutions or that have been lobbied directly by pharmaceutical and biotech industries to promote a certain plan that affects our entire sociological structure.

Next, its all about the fame and money
These two things alone kill objectivity. Industry-funded studies completely ignore conflict of interest and skew any possible hope for real scientific results. This is why institutions like the FDA, supposedly founded on scientific study, are a complete fraud.

Finally, its about the social pandering to guys in white lab coats.
We’ve made scientists Gods while ignoring that they are people with greed, lust for power, and other very human traits.

There aren’t just cracks in the current scientific community, there are gapping gulches that need to be addressed. William A Wilson writes:

"Even if self-correction does occur and theories move strictly along a lifecycle from less to more accurate, what if the unremitting flood of new, mostly false, results pours in faster? Too fast for the sclerotic, compromised truth-discerning mechanisms of science to operate? The result could be a growing body of true theories completely overwhelmed by an ever-larger thicket of baseless theories, such that the proportion of true scientific beliefs shrinks even while the absolute number of them continues to rise. Borges’ Library of Babel contained every true book that could ever be written, but it was useless because it also contained every false book, and both true and false were lost within an ocean of nonsense. [First Things]
Skeptic of science, Michael Shermer, says that science is “a set of methods designed to describe and interpret observed or inferred phenomena, past or present, aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation.”
Science is modifiable and falsifiable, just like religion.
So why have we made it the modern day, untouchable dogma? We can’t treat beliefs as facts, but when science is broken we do. How do we trust science again when it is so shattered? Perhaps its time to trust our guts again, and not every testimony given in the latest scientific journal.

About the Author

Christina Sarich is a writer, musician, yogi, and humanitarian with an expansive repertoire. Her thousands of articles can be found all over the Internet, and her insights also appear in magazines as diverse as Weston A. Price, Nexus, Atlantis Rising, and the Cuyamungue Institute, among others. She was recently a featured author in the Journal, “Wise Traditions in Food, Farming, and Healing Arts,” and her commentary on healing, ascension, and human potential inform a large body of the alternative news lexicon. She has been invited to appear on numerous radio shows, including Health Conspiracy Radio, Dr. Gregory Smith’s Show, and dozens more. The second edition of her book, Pharma Sutra, will be released soon.
Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (6 Reasons Why Most Scientific Research is Fake, False or Fraudulent) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Christina Sarich and It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

<< zurück
weiter >>

Nicht immer stehen Phagen zur Verfügung. Aber es gibt oft mehr wirksame Alternativen zu Antibiotika:

Curcumin - der Stoff von dem alle reden

Überall hört, sieht und liest man von Curcuma, das Gewürz, das den Curries die gelbe Farbe verleiht. Ursprünglich gab die indische Köchin Curcuma nicht wegen des Geschmacks zu nahezu allen Speisen. Curcuma (und andere Gewürze) machen Speisen haltbar, weil sie eine starke antibiotische Wirkung haben. Aufgrund dieser Eigenschaften von Curcuma und weiteren Gewürzen, kann der Mensch sie auch für gesundheitliche Zwecke brauchen. Mehrere Tausend Studien in Indien und aus dem Westen haben aufgezeigt, dass Curcuma viele gesundheitliche Wirkungen hat: antiallergisch, entzündungshemmend, schmerzlindernd ('das pflanzliche Aspirin') und unter bestimmten Bedingungen eben auch antibiotisch um nur ein paar wichtige Aspekte des Wirkstoffes zu schildern. Es wurde zum Beispiel gezeigt, dass Curcumin als Antibiotikum bei Wurzelbehandlungen ebenso gut oder sogar besser wirkt als die übliche Kombination von zwei oder drei hochwirksamen Antibiotika.
Curcumin, der reine Wirkstoff, hat einen entscheidenden Nachteil: er wird normalerweise vom Körper nicht aufgenommen. Es gibt aber zwei Darreichungsformen von Curcumin, welche vom Darm resorbiert werden: Liposomes Curcumin und Nano-Curcumin. Fragen Sie uns, was für Ihre Situation am besten anwendbar wäre und wo Sie es beziehen können.
Benutzen Sie unser

Nano-Silber - Wirkt's oder nicht?

Nano-Silber oder auch colloidales Silber wird allenthalben fast als Wundermittel angepriesen. Sicher ist, dass in vielen Medikamenten unserer Pharmaindustrie, vor allem Cremen und Salben, Silber als Konservierungsmittel und als Antibiotikum beigegeben wird, meist verschleiert mit uralten lateinischen Begriffen, mit denen schon die Alchemisten hantiert haben.
Im Internet werden viele Methoden angepriesen, wie man Nano-Silber selber herstellen könne. Dies ist aber nicht so einfach - wesentliche Details werden unterschlagen. Andere bieten Nano-Silber fixfertig an, allerdings zu horrenden Preisen und mit äusserst geringem Silber-Anteil. Viele verkaufen gar kein Nano-Silber sondern Silber-Salze (wie im Werbebild oben), welche ab einer gewissen Konzentration giftig wirken.
Wenn Sie sich für Nano-Silber bester Qualität interessieren (Eigenschaften, Preis, Bezugsquellen), erkundigen Sie sich bitte mit unserem
Nano-Silber hilft:
Bestes Deo und Antitranspirant
Desinfektion in Küche und Bad
Geruchshemmend bei Sportbekleidung
Hervorragend gegen Fussgeruch
Desinfiziert Wasser uvam.